Sunday, October 1, 2017

Trump, Equifax and other "Stuff" that Happens

Shit happens.

Your car breaks down. 
Trump gets elected.
Equifax gets breached.
And so on...

Shit happens.  It's an elemental truth, a universal constant. Things just have a tendency to go to hell.

Take Trump's election to the White House, for instance.  Over the years, I've heard stories told of people doing doing crazy things at the voting booth, such as electing dogs, mules - even a fucking rhino - to public office.  But Trump?  It really boggles the mind...  The only solace I can get from the stituation is that he didn't win the popular vote (which means that - at the very least - the majority of voters recognized that the man isn't fit for office).  That's not to say that Hillary didn't have issues - she certainly did - but if we're talking about the lesser of two evils...

Anyway, Trump in the White House is just an example of how shit happens, how life throws you a curve ball when you least expect it.  Another example is the Equifax breach.

The Equifax situation is just a debacle, a monumental fuck-up that can only be described as epic.  The amount of data at risk is just mindblowing: the personal information fo 143 million people.  But more than that, the company sat on news of the breach for an extended period - time that the average Joe could have been using to protect themselves!   It's like the fire department getting notice that your house is ablaze, then deciding they're going to finish watching the game before jumping on the truck and heading over.

As everyone knows by now, there hasn't been a lot of accountability as far as Equifax is concerned (eg, the CEO resigned, but will still collect millions in pension benefits).  The company has also set up a website  - https://www.equifaxsecurity2017.com/ - to help individuals determine if their personal information was compromised.  There are also other sites you can visit to help with this situation, including the The FCC's Identity Theft Page, Identity Theft Defense HQ, and more. Probably the best thing to do is take advantage of the free credit monitoring Equifax is offering, initiate a credit freeze, and then just stay vigilant.

Needless to say, these are just two examples of shit not going quite as planned or expected.  Other things will happen on a daily basis, from your car breaking down, to your kid flunking a class in school, to your boss blaming you for something that wasn't your fault.  The bottom line is that shit happens in life.  Moreover, there really isn't a way to plan for it.  All you can do is deal with it - roll with the punches - and try to be ready the next time something goes bananas. 









Wednesday, October 26, 2016

Trump: The Art of Destroying a Political Party.

Haven't posted in a while. Truth be told, I've been rather gunshy since Google banned my account (still don't fully know the reason), but we've since kissed and made up, I guess. I suppose Google's a little like the girlfriend who's mad at you, but instead of telling you why she just says, "You know what you did!"

Anyway, with the Republican Party fracturing right before our very eyes, I couldn't stay away. Trump's campaign is like a runaway train full of nitro, TNT, sulfuric acid and all other kinds of heinous shit, already off the rails and about to attempt a hairpin turn. You can look at him and see that his heart's not really in this any more. Hell, it's pretty clear to anyone who's watching that Trump never even expected to get this far.

Like other billionaires rich people who've sought the nomination in the past, running for President wasn't supposed to result in The Donald actually being on the ticket.  He was supposed to lose the nomination, but attract enough [free] media attention - and perhaps support - that he could parlay it into something else...maybe a modicum of political power, or focus on a particular issue. (Knowing Trump, he'd be honed in on making it into some kind of money-grab.) It probably shocked the shit out of him when he reached a point where he realized he might actually get the nomination.  

But as I wrote in a prior post, Trump is in no way qualified to be Commander-in-Chief, and that's not a surprise to anyone.  Leading Republicans should have disavowed him long ago, but they felt it was better to tow the party line, and now Trump has basically destroyed the Republican Party.  

The GOP was already fractious before Trump came along, with elements like the Tea Party trying to put the party's agenda in a chokehold. Now they've further splintered, and while there may be some outward portrayal of unity going forward, behind the scenes the party as it once was will no longer exist.  

Part of the reason, of course, will be the Great Trump Divide. One side will say, "You didn't tow the party line. You didn't support the party candidate so you're not anyone we can trust." The other side will say, "You backed that maniac, despite every vile and awful thing he said - not to mention him being completely unfit for office. You put politics above common sense, so your judgment is suspect."  Naturally, there are other reasons why the Republicans are destroying themselves, but having Trump as your standard bearer, as the best candidate the party could put forward, didn't help anything. It only further emphasized lines of division that were already there.

In short, lines have been crossed that can't be stepped back over. Bridges have been burned that can't be rebuilt. And when they look back and try to determine who was at fault - who had their hand on the wheel when the GOP went to pieces - they'll try to blame Democrats, the media, everyone else.  But there's no one to blame but themselves.  They picked that candidate. They supported him. They put the detonator in his hand and told him he was free to push the button...and he did.  Put in plain and simple terms, the Republican Party made this happen, brought about their own destruction. No one else is to blame. This was an inside job.  I'm just surprised it took this long for it to happen.






Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Trump's Nomination is All You Need to Know About the Republican Party

Let me start out by saying that I don't like political parties. Like George Washington, I loathe them. They create and perpetuate, among other things, an us-against-them mindset that makes it almost impossible for lawmakers to get anything done.  (For instance, rather than voting on the merits of a new law, members of Congress will instead simply vote along party lines, refusing to support a good idea simply because it was espoused by the other side.) Thus, I've spent my entire voting life as an independent, making it clear that my support has to be earned and doesn't come to anyone merely by virtue of political association. (I realize that this means Democrats and Republicans alike will probably marginalize me and my views, but I can live with that. At least they know that when they step to me they better be bringing something of substance to the table, because I'm not cheering or voting for any ole wide-grinnin', handshakin', baby-kissin' asshole just because we we're both wearing blue or red.)

Anyway, I'm watching the Republican National Convention, and I just keep hoping, praying and just flat-out wondering: "When the fuck is somebody gonna call 'bullshit'?"

I mean, let's be honest: Donald Trump is not a guy you want in the White House. The more he speaks, the more it becomes abundantly clear that he lacks the diplomacy, the leadership skills, and - frankly speaking - the acumen to be President.  The man has spouted not just rabid and inflammatory speech, but also some of the vilest and most loathsome rhetoric I've heard from anyone (let alone a candidate for office) in my life. His words and outlook are divisive and incendiary, rather than being inclusive and embracive.  His focus is more on the differences rather than the similarities between the people he allegedly wants to lead.

And yet, for all that, I'm happy that Trump was able to run for his party's nomination.  I'm glad that someone outside the normal political machine was able to step in shake things up. I'm proud to live in a country where the will of the people make it possible for anyone - even someone like Trump - to get in on the action, so to speak.  Now for what makes me unhappy...

There is absolutely no doubt that Trump is completely unstable unsuitable to be the next President of the United States. This is no secret; everyone knows it - especially the leaders in the Republican Party.  And yet, rather than denounce him, they are throwing their full weight behind him. Rather than stand up and say, "I'm not supporting a guy who I don't think should be in office," they are instead choosing to tow the party line.  I'm not saying that they're like Nazi Germany, blinding following Hitler's edicts and committing atrocities, but I feel like they're all thinking about what's good for them personally rather than what's in the best interest of the country.  (In other words, the party might not support them in the next election cycle if they don't do as expected.)

So, here I sit, waiting for one of these guys to have the cojones to say, "Don't elect this clown." Ted Cruz probably came closest, and even he didn't really say what needed to be said.  Still, I gained a new perspective on Cruz.  He might not have had my vote had he been on the ticket, but he's certainly earned my respect. But where are the other Republicans that - at least prior to this - I looked on favorably? Chris Christie? Paul Ryan? John McCain?  These guys should be vilifying Trump, calling him out, making it clear that his views are starkly in contrast to those of the Republican Party (or just those that they personally espouse).

But the Republican Party leadership isn't doing any of that. Instead, they're supporting Trump. Praising him. Parading him around on their shoulders, like he's the greatest thing since breathable air. That they are doing that rather than the opposite is a telltale sign to me. The fact that they would endorse the candidacy of such a man tells me all I need to know about the Republican Party, and I want no part of them, their platform or their candidate(s).







Friday, May 27, 2016

My Favorite Super Bowl Commercial of 2016

Okay, the Super Bowl has been over for a hot minute, and while this year's game didn't end in as much controversy as last year's (I still don't understand how you don't hand that ball to Beast and let him pound it in), there was the usual amount of chatter about the commercials.
As we all know, Super Bowl commercials are insanely expensive, but advertisers are getting a huge amount of bang for their buck - arguably the biggest television event of the year with a monstrous number of eyeballs glued to the set.  That being the case, there's often a tendency to play it safe when it comes to ads airing during the game. 
What does "play it safe" mean?  Well, comedy always goes over well, so commercials that go for a laugh are always good.  Moreover, ads with babies and animals have a tendency to resonate well with audiences. (One exception to this, in my opinion, was the puppy-monkey-baby commercial that aired this year which apparently tried to combine all of the successful elements I mentioned above. The outcome was a commercial that was...disturbing, to say the least, as the end result was a kind of Frankenstein that made you want to want to join a mob and run after it with torches and pitchforks. Worst of all, the puppy-monkey-baby concept so overshadowed everything else that I can't even recall the product that was actually being advertised. Unless what they were advertising was an actual puppy-monkey-baby...)
Anyway, my favorite commercial this year was the following ad from Dollar Shave Club:
Frankly speaking, I thought this was just hilarious. Plus, I love the way Dollar Shave Club plainly exaggerates the cost of new razor blades in their commercials.  (I think in another one of their ads, a man who is a husband and father contemplates selling one of his kids in order to buy a new razor.) I think they've done a good job of injecting humor into what is typically a dull, humdrum subject, and I hope they continue doing so.

----------------------------------------------------------

***I know that people are going to look at this post and say "WTF? The Superbowl was 6 months ago!"  But I put effort into this shit, okay?  I just forgot to hit "Publish" when I initially finished the post way back when.



Tuesday, February 2, 2016

The Easiest Path to Writing Success: Work Your Tail Off

The great inventor Thomas Edison once said that "Genius is one percent inspiration, ninety-nine percent perspiration."  What this means is that if you have a great idea - even a brilliant one- it doesn't mean jack and will do nothing for you if you don't put some effort into it.  And by "effort," I mean work your ass off. 
 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00N1JQ2UO?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B00N1JQ2UO&linkCode=xm2&tag=wwwinfobarr06-20
Too many times, people think that success should be easy - that the rivers of prosperity should simply flow in their direction without them having to lift a finger.  Sorry Charlie - that's just not how it works. If you want something (and assuming it's something worth having), you're going to have to roll up your sleeves and get your hands dirty. 
 
A prime example of someone wanting something and working like the dickens for it is Chris Pratt, star of Guardians of the Galaxy.  In order to get the role, he dropped 60 pounds and got into the best shape of his life within 6 months.  (In his own words, if you want something like that you have to be willing to "bust your ass" in order to get it.) Still, people seem to think that it should all be handed to them.
 
Take writing, for instance.  On the surface, it probably looks easy: you get an idea for a story, you name some characters, sprinkle in some action - maybe a little romance - and voila! Instant success. Bullshit.
 
First of all, writing a book - like the creative process involved in composing music, painting a picture, etc. - is incredibly hard.  That's why most people who dream of writing a book will never actually start writing one.  Most of those of start writing one won't finish.  The vast majority of those who finish won't publish. And many of those who publish are shocked - shocked, I tell you! - when their finished masterpiece doesn't become a runaway bestseller. 
 
Basically, if you have a great idea for a book, treat it like it's great: Write it to the best of your ability. Get a decent cover. Write an enticing blurb.  Don't just throw it together and stick it out there for the world to see in hopes of making a quick buck. All you will do is tarnish your brand and make people suspicious of the next thing you write.  You don't just want to get to the goal line once; you want to score over and over again, but doing that requires - you guessed it - hard work.
 
In retrospect, don't be afraid of putting your back into it.  Hard work isn't a sin - you won't burn in hell because you put your best effort into your writing. Besides your readers deserve your best work, nothing less.  And so do you.
 
 

Wednesday, December 23, 2015

Gettin' Your [Legit] Hustle On

The term "hustler" has been given a bad rap lately.  There seem to be nothing but negative connotations associated with it. In fact, Dictionary.com defines a hustler as "a person who employs fraudulent or unscrupulous methods to obtain money; swindler."

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005FUTCAE?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B005FUTCAE&linkCode=xm2&tag=wwwinfobarr06-20
The Hustler (1961)
 Other definitions pretty much paint the same picture:
 
"a shrewd or unscrupulous person who knows how to circumvent difficulties;"
 
"a person who makes money by doing something dishonest;"
 
"a person who is always working; usually illegally;"
 
"someone who tries to get something, usually money, by deceiving others."
 
Basically, by today's standards, being a hustler is considered a bad thing, and much of the image associated the word comes from the 1961 movie The Hustler, starring Paul Newman as "Fast" Eddie Felson, an unprincipled pool sharp adept at swindling people at the billiards table.
 
On the other hand, I grew up with a definition of "hustler" that was a lot different.  Although, defined as a "swindler" on Dictionary.com, that same webpage lists another description of "hustler," defining the term as "an enterprising person determined to succeed; go-getter."  Likewise, Oxforddictionaries.com defines the term as "an aggressively enterprising person; a go-getter." This is the definition that I grew up with and am familiar with, and it's the definition I'd apply to myself today.
 
When I was kid, everyone - even my parents - called me a hustler, and it was true.  I was always looking for a way to make a dollar: cutting people's grass, running errands for elderly neighbors, collecting aluminum cans, recycling pop bottles... (Yes, I'm old school.  Coke, Pepsi, and all that crap is still "pop" to me, not soda.)  Of course, there were other ways to accumulate cash.  Some were cool, but not legit (like betting on neighborhood dog races), while others were legit but not cool - like charging my older brother's girlfriend 50 cents to tell her which other girls were calling him. (Some would say that was very uncool, but my brother was an asshole back then, so fuck it.  For the record, we're tight now.)
 
I tended to focus on the legitimate hustles back then, and I still do.  You don't have to break the law to earn your moolah; you've just got to be willing to put in the time and the effort, and it's infinitely more rewarding.  In short, you need to get your legit hustle on.
 
So what's involved in getting your hustle on, legitimately? Fist of all, you typically have to have a job.  That doesn't necessarily mean working for someone else - you can work for yourself - but it does mean that you have something akin to a 9-to-5: steady employment that provides a regular paycheck that you can count on to pay the bills. This is your day job, for lack of a better term. Your "hustle" really applies to the things you do outside of that (assuming you don't have a day job that pays tons of cash, like doctor, lawyer, professional athlete, high-paid entertainer, etc.).
 
Generally, your hustle shouldn't be just another "straight" work gig where you clock in, toil away for a certain number of hours, then clock out again. (The exception here, of course, is if you're working for yourself - say, your family opened a restaurant and you go there after your day job and work until closing.)  It should be a situation where you get to show that "aggressively enterprising" side of your nature.  It should also be something that has massive potential (which is why I say it can't simply be a second job, although I wouldn't argue that working two jobs isn't hustling).  For me, it's going to be writing books.
 
I chose to write books for a number of reasons, including the fact that I like to read, and also have some stories I want to tell. But for my hustle I was also looking for something that was going to generate passive and/or residual income. I tend to use the terms interchangeably, but I define passive income as income earned without you being actively involved in its generation.  A good example of this is probably a car wash.  The guy who owns it barely has to be there, and the business - for the most part - generates money without a lot of oversight.
 
Residual income, on the other and, is earned from some up-front effort that continues to generate cash long after the original work was done.  Books are a good example of this: after you write your novel, it can keep selling (and earning) indefinitely.  This is what I'm looking for with my urban fiction, and with my overall hustle in general.
 
Basically, my hustle involves looking for ways to make my money work harder for me than I work for it, and passive income does that.  Moreover, there are a thousand things you can do to earn passive income: owning vending machines, a Laundromat, rental homes, an ATM business (which is cheaper than you think; you can lease machines for $100/month or less, and they typically generate $200 - $2000 per month).  One of the easiest ways by far to generate passive income is to just buy dividend-paying stocks (eg, AT&T, Coke, Microsoft).  You're using their products anyway; why not get a little something out of it by owning company stock? Tons of everyday people have grown super-rich from dividend-paying stocks.
 
Also, look to leverage any specialized knowledge that you have.  For instance, if you know all about auto mechanics, maybe you can start blogging about common car problems, or writing articles for sites like HubPages.  (You could even teach your own auto mechanics class. Lots of people would love to know how to do something as simple as change their oil.)  Or if you're familiar with a certain type of product (eg, books, computers, sewing machines, what have you), perhaps you can start writing reviews.  Just about all of us have particular knowledge in some field that we can utilize to generate income. (And if you don't have any, try to pick some up: learn a few magic tricks or how to make balloon animals so you can get hired at birthday parties; spend some time playing around with pics and learn how make books covers; and so on. I know a guy who taught himself how to format ebooks for Kindle and he became great at it.)  If you've had an interesting life story, maybe you can become a motivational speaker. The main thing is to use what you've learned over the years to earn some $$$, rather than just letting that knowledge and experience stagnate.
 
Next, look for niches to exploit or needs that haven't been addressed.  A few years back a friend's subdivision had a neighborhood garage sale, and there were all these people wandering around in the hot sun looking for bargains.  He put out a cooler with water and sodas for sale, as well as a table full of snacks; he made a killing. It was short-term (although I suppose you could try to find those sales every weekend), but it was a quick, effortless way to make some easy cash. If you have a lot of followers on social media, maybe you can turn that into an advertising medium. There are lots of areas and things in our day-to-day lives that we can monetize if we're paying attention.
 
Finally, don't be afraid to make an investment in yourself.  You hear all the time that it takes money to make money - well, it's true. You have to be willing to lay out cash in order to be successful, whether it be for promotion, hiring other experts, what have you.  (For instance, most writers have to pay for professional cover art for their books.)  If it's not worth you spending cash to succeed, then it's probably not a hustle worth pursuing. So if you're going to have a vending machine business, you may have to offer a percentage of profits to the owner of a prime location where you want to place your machines. If you're going to have rental homes, you may need to hire a property management company. If you're going to be a singer, you may need to pay to put together a demo in a professional studio.
 
In short, there's absolutely noting wrong with being labeled a hustler, as long as you are out there legitimately pursuing your goals.  Moreover, you can have way more than one hustle.  (Personally, I'm writing books, I invest in stocks, I'm an online affiliate with several companies, I've got an app I plan to develop, and much, much more.)  However, you need to be focused and have a clear plan with respect to what you want to do or achieve. Truthfully speaking, nobody owes you anything and it's very seldom that anyone will simply hand you everything you want in life.  However, there's nothing preventing you from getting out there and hustling, thereby earning what you want.  Nothing, that is, except you.
 

Thursday, December 10, 2015

The Warriors: A Gritty, Urban (Cinematic) Street Gang

So I was just sitting here trying to think of a gritty, urban topic to talk about, when inspiration suddenly hit:  What's more gritty and urban than a street gang?  (Very little, if you want the honest truth.)
 
Most of us have had our image of gangs shaped by television and the movies, and Hollywood hasn't necessarily done a bad job.  Of course, when I mention cinematic gangs, I'm not thinking of finger-snapping, pirouetting cliques like the Jets and the Sharks in West Side Story.  No, I'm thinking of hardcore, in-your-face, belligerent street antics.  And no street crew ever fit the bill like The Warriors.
 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00AEBBADG?creativeASIN=B00AEBBADG&linkCode=w00&linkId=WR5SRDLSV5VKKRUF&ref_=as_sl_pc_tf_til&tag=wwwinfobarr06-20
For those who don't know, allow me to provide a short synopsis: The Warriors (based on a book of the same name by Sol Yurick) is the story of a Coney Island gang that travels to the Bronx for a meeting of all the major New York gangs.  The meeting has been called by Cyrus, the charismatic leader of the Gramercy Riffs. 
 
 
The rules for the meeting are simple: each invited gang is to send nine unarmed representatives.  Once there, Cyrus tells them how - if all the gangs can stop wasting each other at every opportunity - they could rule the streets, because they outnumber the cops by a significant margin.  The idea seems to resonate with almost everyone, but Cyrus is shot and killed by Luther, leader of the Rogues (for, as he later explains "No reason...I just like doing stuff like that.")  The Warriors are wrongfully accused of the killing and spend the rest of the film fighting - literally - to get back to their home turf in one piece, which isn't easy since every gang in New York is after their heads for Cyrus' murder. 
 
I freely admit that I love this movie.  First of all, it's a great action film.  The Warriors have a number of violent, white-knuckle confrontations with other gangs while trekking (mostly on foot) back to Coney Island, and it's just a blast to watch them fearlessly taking on all comers. 
 
Next, the gangs have some incredibly cool names:  The Turnbull ACs, The Hi-Hats, The Baseball Furies, The Gramercy Riffs, etc.  (Of course, not all of the names are awesome.  For instance, The Punks, whom The Warriors face off against in the clip below, obviously could have benefited from some PR research on their group moniker.)
 
 
 
 
 
 Although it's pushing up on 40 years old, the film has handily withstood the test of time and still has cultural relevance.  The bottle-clinking scene near the end of the film (seen here) has been parodied/spoofed dozens of times, it seems.  And a lot of people might remember Shaquille O'Neal constantly saying "Can you dig it?" - whether at basketball games, music award shows, what have you. (You can see one such instance here.)  It's a straight rip from the Warriors:
 
 
 
(But hey, if someone as cool as Shaq uses a tagline from a film, then you know it has to be a good movie.)
 
All in all, it's a great movie and still fun to watch (which is why there's always talk of a remake circulating).  If you haven't ever seen it, you're missing a treat.